Technology Email Lists

Technology Email Lists

Repurposing energy. Another way to create Bitcoin more sustainable is to harness the heat that is generated by Bitcoin mining to do something beneficial by it instead of warming the earth. This approach to capturing wasted heat from computation is known as the the data furnace approach. 

Technology Email Lists

It is a concept that instead of purchasing an electric heater used to heat your home or even to heat the water inside your home, you can purchase a heater that doubles as an Bitcoin mining rig, generating bitcoins while heating your house as a result of the computation. The effectiveness of this method is not that much more than buying an electric heater. maybe this isn’t much more difficult for a homeowner user than connecting their heater to their Internet connection, as well as the power outlet.

There are some drawbacks with this method. Although it’s not the same as electricity as a heater they are in themselves lower in efficiency than propane heaters. Furthermore, what happens when everyone turns off the Bitcoin mining equipment during summer (or at the very least, everyone within this region in the Northern Hemisphere)? The power of mining hashpower could be reduced seasonally, based on the amount of heat individuals require. It could even decrease when the days happen to be hotter than usual! This could cause a variety of interesting outcomes for Bitcoin consensus in the event that the data furnace model did catch on. Buy technology email lists online.

The issue of ownership isn’t entirely clear. If you purchase an Bitcoin data furnace is it yours to have the Bitcoin mining profits you receive, or is the company who bought them from you own them? The majority of people have no desire to engage in Bitcoin mining (and probably never will. Therefore, it could be better to purchase it as an appliance, and let the company who supplied it to you retain the benefits. It could mean that you are selling the appliance at loss , which is the scenario some savvy users may decide to purchase them and then modify them to save the mining profits for themselves, resulting in an ugly DRM (Digital Rights Management) dispute.

The conversion of electricity into cash. A further question that is that Bitcoin has posed Bitcoin is that it may offer the most efficient method to convert the power into cash. Imagine a scenario where Bitcoin mining machines are an widely available commodity and the main expense of mining would be electricity. In reality, this could mean that providing electricity at no cost or for a low price can be used for new types of misuse. Buy technology email lists online.

In many countries across the globe, governments provide subsidies for electricity, especially industrial electricity. In addition the reason they do this is to promote industry being situated in their nation. However, Bitcoin can be a viable method of turning electricity into cash. This could prompt governments to reconsider the way they operate if their subsidised electricity is converted to bitcoins. The purpose of electricity subsidies is to lure businesses to aid the nation’s economy and the labor market, and the subsidization of Bitcoin mining could not have the intended impact. Buy technology email lists online.

Another issue is the millions of accessible electrical outlets across all over the world, in people’s homes Hotels, universities airports, office buildings, and many more. Some people might attempt to plug into mining equipment in order that they can make money while another person is paying for the electricity. In reality, they could be using outdated equipment and do not bother to upgrade since they will not be paying the electric cost. It’s intimidating to think of that you could be monitoring each outlet to find out if it is a possible unauthorised source of power for Bitcoin mining.

Technology email address lists

Mining pools

Think about the financial implications of being a smaller mining. Imagine you put aside $6,000 of hard-earned cash to purchase an attractive, shiny, new Bitcoin mining equipment.

Technology email address lists

Consider that the efficiency is so good that you’re expecting to get a block each 14 months (and keep in mind that a block’s value was approximately 6,500 dollars at the beginning of 2015.).

Amortized, the estimated income of your mining rig could be $400 per month when you add in electric power and other operational costs. If you were to receive a check each month for $400, it could be a good idea to invest in a mining rig. But keep in mind that mining is a random thing. You never know what time you’ll find the next block until it happens, and until then you’ll never make any money. Buy technology email address lists online.

Variance is high. When we examine the distribution of blocks you’re likely find within the first year it is quite high , and the anticipated number is rather low. Since you can find blocks at a fixed low rate that is independent of length of time since the last block you’ve found the expected amount of blocks can be estimated by the Poisson distribution.A Poisson distribution arises when you have a set of N trials that are independent and each has an opportunity of success l/Nof as the number of trials approaches infinite. In the case of Bitcoin mining, every nonce is actually an unplanned trial with an extremely low probability of success, therefore Ni is a huge number even for smaller miners, and the approximation is satisfactory.

If you are expecting to find approximately one block per fourteen months (a Poisson distribution of 6/7 blocks per year) it’s more then 40% likelihood you won’t be able to find any blocks during that first year. If you’re a miner on your own it could be catastrophic. You’ve paid thousands of dollars for the machine, and plenty of electricity to run it, but received nothing in exchange. There’s about 36% chance to discover one block in the first year, which implies that you’re probably barely scraping by even if your electricity expenses weren’t excessive. Also, there’s a less possibility of finding more than two blocks, which means you could earn a decent revenue. Buy technology email address lists online.

These figures are only estimates however the most important point is that, even if it’s possible that you’re doing well which is getting enough of the investment payback However, the risk of losing money is large enough that there’s a high chance you’ll not make any money whatsoever. If you’re a tiny miner that means mining is a huge risk.

Mining pools. In the past, when small-scale entrepreneurs faced a lot risk they created mutual insurance companies to reduce the risk. Farmers, for instance would gather and agree that if an individual farmer’s barn was destroyed, the other farmers would split the profits with the farmer. Do we have a common insurance plan that is suitable for smaller Bitcoin miners?

A mining pool is precisely what it sounds like the mutual protection of Bitcoin miners. Buy technology email address lists online. A group of miners make up a pool, and attempt to mine blocks by using a specific coinbase recipient. This recipient is known as”the pool administrator. In other words, regardless of who finds the block and finds it, you will be rewarded with the reward. The manager of the pool will collect this revenue and distribute it among all participants of the pool based upon the amount of work each person actually did. It is expected that the manager of the pool is likely to also take any kind of cut in exchange to cover their work in managing the pool.

Technology email id lists

If everyone trusts the pool’s administrator this is great for decreasing miners’ variance. However, how does the manager of a pool be aware of the amount of work every member of the pool actually does? How does the manager of the pool divide the profits in proportion to how much work every miner has to do?

The pool manager obviously isn’t going to accept everyone’s word because some people might say that they’ve done something more than they actually have.

Technology email id lists

Mining shares. There’s a smart solution to this issue. Miners can show that they are performing by releasing shares, or near-valid blocks. Let’s say the goal is a number that begins with the number 67. The hash of a block must be less than the number of targets in order for the block to be considered valid. When seeking out such a block Miners may find blocks with hashes that begin with a large number of zeros, but not exactly 67. Miners can present these legitimate blocks to show that they’re indeed functioning. A share could require forty or fifty zeros according to the type of miners it is designed for.

The manager of the pool will operate an Bitcoin node for the benefit of all participants gathering transactions and then assembling them into an unblock. The manager will also include their personal address in the transaction with Coinbase and then send this block out to each the pool participants. Everyone in the pool is working on this block and can prove that the block is being worked on by contributing shares. Buy technology email id lists online.

If a participant in the pool locates a block that is valid the pool member sends it over to the manager of the pool who distributes the prize according with the work performed. The person who discovers the block does not receive any special reward, however when a different miner has done more work than the another miner is paid more, even if they were not the one that ended with a valid block.

There are several alternatives for how the pool manager determines the amount to pay each miner on the basis of the shares they offer. Here we will look at two of the more common, simple methods. There are other reward methods that are utilized, but these two will demonstrate the difference between reward programs. Buy technology email id lists online.

Pay-per-share. In the pay-per-share model the pool manager is paid the miners a flat amount for each share above a certain level of difficulty for the block the pool is currently working on. With this model, miners can transfer their shares to the manager of the pool immediately and receive their share with no waiting around for the pool locate an appropriate block.

In certain ways, the model of pay-per-share is the most suitable for miners. Buy technology email id lists online. You are guaranteed a certain amount

of cash every whenever they locate an opportunity to purchase a amount of money every time they discover a. The pool manager is basically responsible for all risk as they

You can earn rewards even if a block is not discovered. Naturally due to the higher risk, the

If the model is pay-per-share, the pool manager is likely to have higher costs when compared to other

models.

Technology email directory lists

The issue with the pay-per-share system is the fact that mining companies do not really have any incentive to deliver legitimate blocks to pool’s manager. They can throw out valid blocks and still receive the same reward and cause an enormous loss for the pool. A malicious manager of a pool could target a pool that is competing by this method to attempt to force it out of the market.

Technology email directory lists

Proportional. In the proportional system, instead of paying set cost per share, the amount paid is based on the fact that the pool actually located an appropriate block. When a valid block is discovered, the rewards of the block are divided among members in proportion to the amount of effort they actually put into.

In the proportional model miners are still at a risks that are proportional to those of the pool as a whole. If the pool is big enough that the variation in the frequency at which it finds blocks is likely to be quite minimal. A proportional payout is safer for the pool’s manager since the payouts are only made when blocks that are valid are discovered. This can also solve the issues we have discussed using the pay-per share model because miners are encouraged to submit legitimate blocks they discover since it will bring revenue back to them.

The proportional model demands some extra work on the part of pool managers to confirm that they are able to calculate, distribute, and pay rewards in comparison to the pay-per-share flat model. Buy technology email directory lists online.

The idea of pool Hopping. With just two kinds of pools, we could observe that miners could be attracted to switch between pools at different time. To illustrate this, take into consideration the fact that a pure proportional pool is able to pay a higher amount per share when it is able to locate a block rapidly, since it will pay one block’s reward regardless of the length of time since the block was discovered.

If a smart miner is able to figure out how, they could consider making use of a proportional pool earlier into the process (just after the block was discovered) as the benefits per share are high, then change (“hop”) into the pay-per-share option later during the course of the year, after the expected benefits of mining with a proportional pool small. Due to this, proportional pool mining isn’t very feasible. More complex schemes, like “pay per last Nshares submitted” are more popular however, even these are susceptible to the subtle behavior of pool hopping. It is still unclear what can be done to create a mining pool reward system that is not susceptible to such manipulation. Buy technology email directory lists online.

History and standardization.Mining pools first started around 2010 in the GPU era of Bitcoin mining. They immediately became well-known due to the simple fact that they decreased the variance of the miners. They’ve gotten quite sophisticated in the last few years. There are a variety of protocols on the operation of mining pools. It’s even been suggested that mining pool protocols be standardized in Bitcoin itself. 

Like the Bitcoin protocol to run the peer-to peer network, mining pool protocols offer an API to allow the manager of the pool to communicate with every member specifics of the block to work on and also for miners to relay back to the manager of the pool shares they’ve discovered. Getblocktemplate (GBT) is officially recognized as the Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP). Another alternative method, Stratum, is currently more popular and is being considered as a BIP. As opposed to the Bitcoin protocol It is an issue to have multiple different mining protocols. Each pool is able to choose the one they prefer and let the market choose.

Technology email outlook lists

Certain mining equipment has these protocols built-in at their hardware, but this could eventually limit their development capabilities to a certain extent.

Technology email outlook lists

But, it is easy to purchase an item of mining equipment and then join the pool. Simply plug it into the wallit will be powered by electricity as well as your network connection select a pool, then it’ll begin receiving instructions to mine from that pool, and then converting the electricity you use into cash.

51% of mining pools. Since early 2015 the majority of miners are mining via pools, and very few miners are working “solo” anymore. As of the month June 14, Ghash.io was the most popular mining site. It became to be so large that it was able to handle more than 50% of all capacity of the Bitcoin network. In essence, Ghash provided such an attractive price to the participating miners that the majority of them wanted to sign up. Buy technology email outlook lists online.

It’s something people were worried about for quite a while and caused an outrage against Ghash. In August the market share of Ghash decreased because they had shut down accepting new users. Two mining companies controlled about half the power of the network.

In April of 2015, the situation appears much different and less focused at the very most on the surface. It is possible that pools could end up getting 51% shares is an issue in the community, however, the bad press GHash received has forced the pools to stay away from growing too much since then. With the advent of new pools and miners have entered the market , and standard protocols have increased the possibility of switching mining pools and pools, markets share for the various pools has remained largely in flux. It is still to be seen how the market will develop in the future. Buy technology email outlook lists online.

It is important to note that mining pools could conceal the actual the power of mining within the control of a few major mining corporations that are able to participate in multiple mining pools at the same time to conceal their actual size. This is called laundering hashes.It is not known how well-controlled physical control over mining equipment actually is and mining pool membership makes this extremely difficult to identify from a distance.

Do mining pooling facilities are a great thing? The advantages of mining pool is that it makes mining more predictable for participants and make it much easier for miners of smaller size to be into the action. Without the mining pool the variation would render mining impossible for many smaller miners. Buy technology email outlook lists online.

Another benefit for mining pools because there is a central pool manager connected to the network, and also assembling blocks it is easier to update the network. It is possible to upgrade the software that is running the management of the mining pool runs will update to the latest software all the members of the pool are running.

The primary drawback to mining pools, obviously it is that they’re an example of centralization. It isn’t clear what power the owners of a massive mining pool actually possess. The theory is that miners have the right to exit a mining pool if they believe it’s as being too powerful, however it’s unclear when miners make that decision in actual practice. Buy technology email outlook lists online.

Another issue with mining groups is it reduces the number of people operating an officially validating Bitcoin node. Prior to this, all miners regardless of their size they were, needed to run their own fully validating Node. They had to keep the entire chain of blocks and verify every transaction. Buy technology email outlook lists online. Nowadays, the majority of miners delegate this task to their pool managers. This is the principal reason behind why, as have discussed in Chapter 3of this article, the number fully validated nodes could decrease within Bitcoin. Bitcoin network.

If you’re concerned by the degree of centralization brought about from mining companies, then you may think: can we rethink the mining process to ensure that there aren’t any pools, and everyone has to mine on their own? We’ll address this during Chapter 8.

Technology email database

Resources incentives, strategies and mining incentives

The majority of this chapter discussing how the biggest problem of a miner is acquiring the right hardware and finding inexpensive electricity, and then getting it going as quick as you can, and hoping for luck. There are some fascinating decisions that every miner needs to consider before choosing which blocks to mine.

Technology email database

1. Which transactions should be included. Miners can choose which transactions to add to the block. The standard approach is to include all transactions that is subject to a transaction cost greater than a certain minimum.

2. What block should I mine on.Miners can also choose the top block they would like to mine. The default for this would be to expand the length of the valid chain.
3. The choice between blocks of identical height. If two blocks are mined and declared at the same time the result is one block fork, which makes each block being admissible in accordance with the longest valid chain policy. Miners have to then choose which block to expand. The default is to add on to the block they first heard about the first time.

4. When to announce the new blocks.When they discover an unblockable block, miners need to decide when they will declare it in Bitcoin. Bitcoin network. The standard practice would be to declare it instantly however, they may decide to wait a while before announcing the block. Buy technology email database online.

So miners face several choices. Each decision has an default strategy that is employed to implement bitcoin reference. Bitcoin referrer client that is utilized by the majority of miners as of writing. There is a chance that a non-default approach will yield more profit. Discovering such strategies and scenarios is a thriving area of study. Let’s take a look at some possible profitable ways to deviate from the default behaviour. In the discussion below we’ll assume there’s a non-default mining company that has control of a certain percentage of the mining power, which we’ll identify with the letters.

Forking attack. The most basic method is to fork attack , and the best way to make money is by performing a double-spend. The miner transfers money to the person who is a victim Bob to pay for a good or service. Bob is waiting and discovers that the transaction that he is paying is indeed within the chain. Maybe he uses the typical method and waits for six confirmations in order to ensure. As if he is convinced that he was compensated, Bob ships the good or provides the service. Buy technology email database online.

The miner is now in the process of and works on a previous blockahead of the block contains the transaction made to Bob. In this chain that is forked, the miner inserts an alternative transaction, or double spend that will send the funds that were paid by Bob in the chain to the miner’s addresses.

In order for the attack to be successful the forked chain has to surpass the longest chain currently in use. After this it is the time that the transaction that paid Bob is no longer in the block chain consensus. This is likely to happen in the event that the miner who is attacking has the largest share of hashing power — which is, if the hash power greater than 0.5. Even although there’s lots of random variations in how blocks are found and the chain increasing faster than average will eventually get longer. Additionally, because the miner’s money has already been used (on the latest consensus chain) The transaction that was paid by Bob is no longer able to appear on blocks. Buy technology email database online.

Is 51% necessary? Forking attacks are definitely possible when the number is greater than 0.5. In the real world, it may be possible to carry out this type of attack for a bit smaller than other factors , such as the network overhead. The default miners within the primary chain are likely to create stale blocks, for the most common reason being that there’s a long delay for miners to learn about the other’s blocks. However, a central attacker could communicate more efficiently and create smaller blocks that are not stale, which could result in savings of 1 percent or more.

Technology users email database

However, at a level of 50%, the attack could take a long time be successful due to random chance. The attack becomes easier and more effective the higher you get over 50 percent.

Technology user email database

It is commonplace to speak of 51% attacks as if it’s the threshold that magically permits a forking attack. Actually it’s more of a gradient.

Countermeasures that can be applied in a practical manner. It’s unclear if the forking attack will work in real life. It is possible to detect the attack and it’s possible the community could choose to stop an attack and refuse accept the alternative chain, even although it’s longer.

Attacks and the rate of exchange. It’s also likely that an attack of this kind could completely ruin bitcoin. Bitcoin rates of exchange. If a miner perpetrated such a scheme, confidence in the system would decrease and the rate of exchange would drop as people attempt to take their wealth off the market. So, even though attackers with 51 percent of the hashing capacity could gain in the short run by double-spending, they could be a serious threat to their long-term earnings ability to simply mine truthfully and earn the mining profits.

This is why the most plausible motive for a forking attack would be to specifically destabilize the currency through a drastic loss of faith. It is referred to as an attack known as a Goldfinger attack in reference to the Bond villain who attempted to destroy all the gold inside Fort Knox to make it worthless. The goal of a Goldfinger attacker’s objective could be to destabilize the currency, or perhaps to gain money either through shorting Bitcoin or having substantial stakes in a rival currency. Buy technology user email database online.

Forking attack using bribery.Buying enough hardware to handle all of hash power seems to be a costly and complicated task. However, it’s possible that there’s a simpler method of launching an attack by forking. Although it’s costly to buy directly enough mining equipment to be more than everyone else in the globe, it could be possible to get the individuals who control the capacity to act for you.

There are many methods to get bribed by miners. One method is to go “out of band” -Perhaps you can find some big mining companies and give them a cash envelope to work with your fork. Another method is to set up a new mining pool and operate it for a loss, providing higher incentives over other pool. Although the rewards may not last however, an attacker can keep them running for sufficient time to start a forking attack, and even make a earn a profit. Another method is to leave large “tips” in blocks on the forking chain- sufficient to force miners to quit the longest chain and begin working at the other chain with the hope that it will be the longest chain and are able to gather tips. Buy technology user email database online.

Whatever the mechanisms behind Bribing, the concept is the similar: instead of purchasing all mine capacity in one go, an person who is bribing gives the ones with it, to assist them in overcoming that longest chain.

Maybe miners don’t wish to contribute since it would harm the currency in which they’ve put in such a large amount of money and mining equipment. However mining companies as a whole might want to maintain the viability of the currency however, they do not act in a collective manner. Miners may be deviant and pay a bribe, when they believe they could earn greater profits in the short-term. This is an example of a tragic loss for the commons from a financial standpoint. Buy technology user email database online.

Nothing has occurred and it’s an open debate as to whether the bribery scheme described here is even possible.

Technology users email lists

Block-withholding attack that is temporary. Imagine that you’ve just discovered an attack. The standard procedure is to immediately announce the block to the network. However, when you’re executing the temporary block-withholding method and you’re not able to announce it immediately.

Technology user email lists

Instead, you attempt to gain an advantage by performing additional mining over this block, hoping to find two blocks before the rest of the network can even find one, while making sure your blocks remain secret all the time.

In the event that you are ahead of the general chain by two blocks, all the mining efforts of the other network members will be in vain. Others are likely to mine on top what they consider to be the longest chain but when they discover an acceptable block, you are able to announce the two blocks you’d been keeping. This would immediately be the latest longest valid chain. The block that others in the network has worked so hard for was immediately abandoned and separated to the largest chain. 

This has been dubbed selfish mining. By causing other members users to use up energy trying to find an undiscovered block that you could then cause it to become outdated, you can increase the amount of mining reward. Buy technology user email lists online.

The problem is that you must be lucky to spot two blocks in one row. It’s likely that someone else in the network will announce an actual block, even though you’re just one block ahead. In the event of this happening, you’ll need to announce your block’s secret. It creates a one-block fork, and each miner has to decide which block which to focus their efforts on. You hope that a significant portion or other players will be aware about your block and decide to take action. 

The success of this plan depends on your capacity to be victorious in these races, which is why the position of your network is vital. You can try to peer at every node to ensure that your block can reach the most of the nodes first. Buy technology user email lists online.

It turns out that when you think that you will only have 50 percent of winning the races, then selfish mining can make a difference over the usual strategy if you have you have a value of .25. Even if you’re unable to win every race however, selfish mining is more profitable when you’re able to win more than .333. The existence of this type of attack is quite shocking and in contrast to the widely-held belief that there’s no such thing as the major portion of the networkswhich is the case with the=

.5 In the end, there was no more efficient mining strategy than the default. It’s therefore not an appropriate assumption to conclude that a miner who does not control the majority of the network won’t have something to gain from switching to an alternative strategy. Buy technology user email lists online.

At the moment, the temporary withholding of blocks is an idea and hasn’t been observed in actual. Selfish mining is fairly simple to spot since it will increase the number of close-to-simultaneous announcements.

Forking with a punitive or blacklist. A miner might want to block transactions coming from address X. In this case, they would like to block the account with that address, rendering it inaccessible to spending. Maybe you plan to make money from this via an extortion or ransom exortion scheme that demands that the person on your blacklist pay you to be removed from your blacklist. The blacklisting process could also be something that you’re required to do due to legal obligations. Some addresses may be designated as a threat by the government. Law enforcement authorities could demand that miners operating within their area try to block these addresses.

Technology users mailing lists

The conventional wisdom is that there’s no method to block addresses from Bitcoin. If some miners aren’t willing to add certain transactions to blocks, others will. If you’re mining and you want to blacklist a transaction you may want to go for something more robust, such as punitive forking. You could declare that you’ll not work on any chain that contains a transaction which originates via this email address. If you’re able to hold the majority of the hash power it will be enough to ensure that the transactions on blacklists will not be published. Other miners would likely give up, as this would result in their blocks to slide into forks.

Technology user mailing lists

Feather-forking. Punitive forking does not appear to function without the majority of network’s hash power. In announcing that you’ll not mining on any network that contains specific transactions, if the chain comes to existence and is recognized by the majority of the network as the longest chain you’ll have cut yourself out of the consensus chain for ever (effectively creating the concept of a hard fork) and all your mining will be wasted. The worst part is that those transactions on the blacklist will be included in one of the largest chains. Buy technology user mailing lists online.

Also threats to blacklist certain transactions by punitive forking in this way isn’t credible so for the mining companies are involved. However, there’s a better way to go about it. Instead of declaring that you’ll forever fork as soon as you discover a transaction at address X, you announce you’ll try to fork when you spot a block that includes a transaction that originates at address X, but that you’ll stop after a few minutes. For instance, you could announce that once K blocks confirm that the transaction came at address X, you’ll switch to your longest chain.

If you stop after a single confirmation, your probability of being unable to merge the block is high. The transaction of X a2
It is . The reason behind this is that you’ll need to discover two consecutive blocks to remove the block

a2
the transaction that originates from the address X prior to the time the entire network discovers a block . It is the possibility that you’ll be lucky two times. Buy technology user mailing lists online.

The odds of getting a2m may not sound very promising. If you have control of 20 percent of the hashpower that’s a mere 4percent chance of eliminating the transaction you don’t want on the blockchain. However, it’s more likely than it appears as you may be able to convince other miners to join in with you. If you’ve been open about your intentions, other miners will know that if they add an address-based transaction, they have a chance that the block they discover could be wiped out due to your feather-forking attack. When they lack significant reason to make this transaction on account X and the transaction doesn’t incur a an excessive transaction fee that could result in them losing their mining reward could be more compelling than obtaining an amount for the transaction. Buy technology user mailing lists online.

There is a possibility that other miners might rationally decide to join you in enforcing the blacklist so you are able to make a blacklist enforceable even if you have a score of .5. Its success tactic will depend on how convincing to other miners you’ll definitely split.

Technology users mailing address lists

Moving to mining rewards, which are which are mostly dominated by transaction fees. Since the year 2015, transactions fees do not have much significance as block rewards comprise the largest portion — more than 90% of the profits miners earn.

Technology user mailing address lists

However, every four years, the block reward is set to be cut in half in the near future, and eventually the reward for block mining will be so low that transactions fees will be the primary source of revenue for miners. It’s not clear how miners will function as transaction fees become their primary source of revenue. Will miners be more determined in enforcing fee-for-transaction minimums. Will they cooperate in enforcing that?

Open-ended problems. In short Miners can adopt any strategy they wish, however in the real world we’ve observed very little other than using the standard strategy. There isn’t a complete model of miners’ behavior that suggests that what strategy to use is best. In this chapter, we’ve looked at specific instances of deviations that can prove profitable for miners with enough hash power. Mining strategies are an area where the actual practice is superior to the research. In our experience, in a scenario where most mining users do opt for the most popular approach, Bitcoin seems to work very well. We’re not certain whether it’s working in the abstract. Buy technology user mailing address lists online.

It is also impossible to be certain that it will remain in good working the real world. The realities are likely to change for Bitcoin. Mining is becoming more centralized and professional, while the capacity of the network is growing. In the future Bitcoin has to deal with the change from fixed rewards for mining to transaction charges. We aren’t sure how this will unfold and using game theory models to attempt to predict the future is an extremely interesting field of study.

Bitcoin and Anonymity

“Bitcoin is a secure and anonymous digital currency”

— WikiLeaks donations page

“Bitcoin won’t hide you from the NSA’s prying eyes”

— Wired UK

The most controversial aspects concerning Bitcoin is the claim to its anonymity. Buy technology user mailing address lists online. In the first place, is Bitcoin secure? As you will see from the contradictory statements above There’s a bit of confusion over this. The second question is, do we want a cryptocurrency which is truly private? The pros and cons for anonymity. This leads to the following questions: is an unidentified cryptocurrency good to all parties involved? Does it benefit the society? Do you know how to remove the positive aspects of anonymity and do away of the negative ones?

The questions are difficult since they depend on one’s moral values. Buy technology user mailing address lists online. We will not address them during this article, however, we’ll examine arguments in favor of as well as against the concept of anonymity. We’ll mostly focus on various technologies — including those already in Bitcoin and others that are being proposed to be added in order to enhance the security of Bitcoin. We’ll also examine proposals for alternative cryptocurrency that offer distinct anonymity characteristics in comparison to Bitcoin. These technologies pose new questions. How do they function? What would be the difficulty to implement? What trade-offs must be considered when the process of adopting them?

Anonymity Basics

Definiting anonymity. Before we can debate whether (or in what degree) Bitcoin is anonymous, we must define the term “anonymity. It is important to understand what we mean by “anonymity” and the connection between anonymity and other terms such as privacy.

Technology users mailing database online

On a more literal level the word “anonymous” means “without a name.” If we translate this concept to Bitcoin it is possible to come up with two possibilities: either interacting with no real name, or not having any identity at all.

Technology user mailing database online

The two interpretations can lead to completely different conclusions regarding the degree to which Bitcoin is a shady transaction. Bitcoin addresses are public keys that have been hashed. It is not necessary to have a real name to connect with the system. However, you will utilize the public key hash to establish your identity. According to the first theory, Bitcoin is anonymous as you don’t use your real name. However, according to this second view, it’s not. The email address uses is considered to be a pseudonymous identity. In the world of computer science this middle option of using an identity that’s not actually your name is known as pseudonymity.

You are entitled to make the number of Bitcoin addresses as you want. In this light it is possible that you are thinking that Bitcoin addresses are really pseudo-identities since you are able to create any number of pseudonyms as you want. As we’ll discover, this isn’t enough to mean that you can make Bitcoin private. Buy technology user mailing database online.

In computer science, anonymity refers to pseudonymity together with unlinkability.Unlinkability is a property that’s defined with respect to the capabilities of a specific adversary. Unlinkability implies that, if a person engages in a series of interactions with the system the different interactions must not be be linked from the viewpoint of the adversary being considered.

Sidebar.The difference between anonymity and pure pseudonymity is something you may have heard about from various different contexts. A good example of this is forums on the internet. For a forum such as Reddit where you can choose an identity that is long-term and you participate for a long period of time using the chosen pseudonym. It is possible to make multiple pseudonyms, or create a new one every time you post, but it could be extremely tedious and frustrating and the majority of people do not do it. Therefore, interacting with Reddit is generally pseudonymous but it’s not completely anonymous. 4Chan is, however, is an online forum on which people post their posts anonymously, without or no attribution whatsoever. Buy technology user mailing database online.

Bitcoin is pseudonymous, however, the fact that it is pseudonymous does not mean your aim is to gain the privacy you desire. Remember the fact that Bitcoin’s block chain remains publicly accessible and anyone is able to look up any Bitcoin transactions that involve an address. If someone is able to connect the Bitcoin account to your actual identity that means every transaction you make -both present and in the future be linked to your personal identity.

To add insult to injury connecting an Bitcoin account to a physical identity is typically simple. If you are involved with an Bitcoin company — whether an online wallet service exchange, or another merchant , they are typically going to need your real name for them to let you do business with them. For instance exchanges may require the details of your credit card as well as a business will require your address for shipping. Buy technology user mailing database online.

Perhaps you’ll visit a cafe and purchase your coffee using bitcoins. Because you’re physically in the shop the barista is aware of something about your identity, even if they don’t inquire about your actual name. Your identity as a physical person is connected in one way or another to those Bitcoin transactions, which means that all other transactions that were based on that address linked to you. This is definitely not anonymous.

Best Technology users mailing database

Side channels. Even if a direct connection isn’t possible the profile of your pseudonymous account could be removed from anonymity due to the side channels or indirect leaks of information. For instance, someone could check out a profile with fake Bitcoin transactions and observe at what hours of the day the user is online.

Best Technology user mailing database

It is possible to correlate this information with other public information. Maybe they’ll find that a Twitter user is active at the same times and can create a link with the pseudonymous Bitcoin profile and the real identity (or at the very least, an actual Twitter account). The fact is that pseudonymity cannot ensure privacy or security. To achieve these we need the more powerful property of unlinkability , too.

Unlinkability. To comprehend the unlinkability of Bitcoin context Let’s look at the key characteristics that are necessary to allow Bitcoin activity to be non-linkable:

1. It is likely to be difficult to link multiple addresses belonging to one user. Buy best technology user mailing database online.

2. It is likely to be difficult to connect multiple transactions performed by the same person.

3. It isn’t easy to connect the person who made the payment to its recipient.

These two property types are obvious, however the third one is more difficult. If you think of “a payment” as a Bitcoin transaction then that third attribute is obviously not true. Every transaction involves inputs and outputs which means that these inputs and outputs will to be part of the block chain and publically connected. What is meant by a “payment” isn’t a one-off Bitcoin payment, but any transaction that is capable transfer of bitcoins between the payer and the receiver. It may involve a circular sequence of transactions. The thing we must ensure is that it’s not possible to connect the sender and the final recipient of the money by studying the chain of transactions.

Anonymity set. In the broad sense of payments this third property is impossible to achieve. If you purchase something that is priced at a certain amount of bitcoins, and then you make the payment via a loopy transaction route. Anyone who is looking through the chain may be able to draw an idea from the facts that particular quantity of bitcoins went through at one address, and the same amount (minus fees for transactions, maybe) were deposited at an different address. Furthermore, despite the tangled method, the initial transfer and final receiving will take place within the same timeframe because the merchant would like to receive payments without much of an interruption. Buy best technology user mailing database online.

Due to this issue We don’t usually try to create a complete lack of linkability between all the possible addresses or transactions within the system instead, rather, some kind of limit. If you have a specific adversary, the anonymity set of you transaction will be the list of events that can’t be distinguished by your transaction. Even if they know you’ve made a transaction they’re able to tell there is a transaction within this set but not know which one it’s. We attempt to increase your anonymity setthat is, the list of addresses or transactions that we are able to hide.

The process of calculating the anonymity set can be challenging. Since the anonymity set can be specified in relation to one particular adversary or group of adversaries, it is necessary to first define precisely the model of your adversary. It is important to think about what your adversary’s knowledge is about them, what they aren’t aware of and the details that we want to conceal from our adversaries — or what they don’t know in order for your transaction to qualify to be classified as anonymous. There is no standard method to accomplish this. It’s a matter of carefully studying every system and protocol on a case-by case basis.

Best Technology users mailing address lists

Analysis of taint. The Bitcoin community, users frequently conduct intuitive analyses of anonymity-related services without strict definitions. Taint analysis is a popular method: it’s a method of determining the degree to which “related” two addresses are. If bitcoins that are sent from the address S always land at an address R either directly or via various intermediate addresses, S along with R will be able to have a good score on taint.

Best Technology user mailing address lists

The formula takes into account transactions that have multiple inputs or outputs, and outlines the method of distributing the taint.

The problem is that taint analysis does not an accurate indicator of Bitcoin anonymity. It assumes implicitly that the attacker is using the same calculation method to connect addresses. A more sophisticated adversary could employ different methods for example, such as looking at time of transactions or utilize the peculiarities of wallet software, as we’ll explore in the following chapter. Therefore, taint analysis may indicate that you’re enjoying an extremely high level of anonymity in a particular scenario, but you may not. Buy best technology user mailing address lists online.

We need to be anonymous. In light of what anonymity is and what it means, let’s address some questions about anonymity , before going further to ask: What are the reasons people desire anonymity? What are ethical implications of using the option of a currency that is anonymous?

In the case of block chain-based currencies every transaction is stored on the ledger, this means they can be forever and easily identifiable to the addresses associated with them. Therefore, the security that you enjoy with Bitcoin transactions could be much more invasive than traditional banking. If your identity in real life ever is associated with an Bitcoin address that is, you’ve completely lost all privacy regarding any transactions, both present and future with that account. Because this block chain’s information is publically accessible, anyone could be able to execute this kind of deanonymization without being aware that you’ve been recognized. Buy best technology user mailing address lists online.

In this context we can see two motives behind the creation of anonyme cryptocurrency. The first one is to attain the same degree of privacy we have come to in traditional banking and to reduce the risk of deanonymization that the public blockchain is bringing. The second goal is to go beyond the privacy standards of traditional banking and create digital currencies that make it impossible for anyone to track the users.

Morality of anonymity.There are many significant (though often ignored) reasons behind anonymity which we often overlook in the case of traditional currencies. Buy best technology user mailing address lists online. The majority of people do not want to share their income with their family, acquaintances and colleagues. If addresses on the blockchain can be identified but they also receive their pay in Bitcoin it could be easy to determine the amount they earn by looking for a significant regular monthly installment. 

There are also privacy issues with regard to financial transactions. For example, if the video game console maker were to be spotted in the blockchain settling the subcontractor who makes virtual reality glasses this could alert the general public (and their rivals) regarding a new product they’re planning to launch.

Best Technology users mailing id database

There is a legitimate concern that completely anonymous cryptocurrency can be used to finance money laundering, or for other criminal actions. The positive side is that although cryptocurrency transactions can be anonymous or pseudonymous but the link between fiat and digital currency is not.

Best Technology user mailing id database

Actually, these transactions are strictly controlled and monitored, as we’ll discover later in this chapter. Thus, cryptocurrencies cannot be a solution to money laundering or other financial crimes.

But one could think: why don’t we design the technology in that only best privacy benefits are permitted and the ones that are not in some way prohibited? This is actually a frequent request for privacy and computer security researchers. However, it isn’t turned into a possibility. The reason is because use situations that we consider to be ethically acceptable or not from an moral standpoint are actually technologically similar. In Bitcoin there isn’t any clear idea what we can do to assist miners with making moral choices regarding which transactions should be included. Buy best technology user mailing id database online.

We believe that the potential benefits created by the anonymity of cryptocurrencies justify their existence, and that we should be able to separate the properties of technical anonymity of this system and the legal guidelines that we follow in the use of the currency. It’s not an entirely satisfactory alternative, yet it’s the most efficient way to reach an acceptable trade-off.

Sidebar: Tor. The moral problem of how to deal with a system that has both positive and negative uses isn’t specific to Bitcoin. Another anonymity-based system that is a source of controversy is Tor which is an anonymous communications network. Buy best technology user mailing id database online.

On one side, Tor is used by regular people looking to keep themselves safe from being monitored online. It is used by activists, journalists and dissidents to express their opinions freely online without fearing consequences from oppressive regimes. Tor is also utilized by law enforcement agencies who wish to observe people online without disclosing their IP addresses (after all, the ranges or blocs of IP addresses allocated to various organizations, such as police agencies, are widely known). Evidently, Tor has a number of functions that could be morally acceptable. But there are also clearly negative uses. It’s utilized by botnet operators to give commands to computers that are infected under their control, and also to spread child sexual images of abuse. Buy best technology user mailing id database online.

Differentiating between these applications on a technical basis is almost impossible. The Tor developers as well as members of the Tor community have been wrestling with this dilemma. Society has also grappled with the issue to a certain extent too. It seems that we’ve concluded that, in the end, it’s better for all of humanity that technology is available. One of the primary funding sources for Tor Tor program is U.S. State Department. 

They are keen on Tor because it allows the freedom of speech online to those who are opposed to oppressive regimes. While law enforcement agencies appear to accept Tor’s existence and have devised methods to circumvent it. The FBI is regularly able to stop websites operating that were on”the “dark net” that distributed images of sexual assault on children and videos, even though the sites were hidden behind Tor. Most of the time, this happens because the site’s operators fell over. It is important to remember that technology is merely an instrument, and that the those who commit crimes are within the world, and they can leave physical evidence behind or make human errors while using technology.

Best Technology users mailing leads

Anonymization vs. decentralization.We’ll see a recurring theme throughout this chapter that the design criteria of anonymization and decentralization are often in conflict with one another. If you remember Chaum’s ecash in its preface you will notice that it gained absolute anonymity however, it was achieved through an interactive protocol for blind signatures with a central authority the bank.

Best Technology user mailing lists

As you’ll see, these protocols are extremely difficult to remove from central control. If we decide to are decentralizing, we need to maintain some kind of system to track transactions and avoid double spending. The public tracking of transactions can be a risk to the privacy of those who transact.

In this chapter, we’ll be looking at Zerocoin and Zerocash as anonymous, decentralized cryptos with a few similarities to Chaum’s ecash however they need to deal with a number of difficult cryptographic challenges due to these two drawbacks. Buy best technology user mailing leads online.

How to De-anonymize Bitcoin

We’ve stated numerous times that Bitcoin is a pseudonymous currency which means that all your accounts or transactions might be linked. Let’s take a review of how this could be happening.

Figure 6.1 illustrates a small portion of an excerpt from the Wikileaks contribution webpage (including that quote near the start in the first chapter). You’ll notice the refresh button right next to the donor’s address. Like you would expect, clicking this link will change the address of donation with a brand newaddress that has been created. If your browser refreshes, or shut it down and then return later, it will be displaying an entirely new address that has never been had. 

This is because Wikileaks is determined to ensure that every single donation they receive will be credited to a unique public key that they created specifically for this goal. Wikileaks is making the most of the possibility to make new pseudonyms. This is, in fact, the most secure method of anonymity employed in Bitcoin wallets. Buy best technology user mailing leads online.

It’s easy to think that the different addresses are not linked. Wikileaks receives every donation in a separate way and, presumably, they could also spend those donations on a separate basis. However, things can quickly go downhill.

Linking. Imagine that Alice is looking to purchase teapots that cost eight bitcoins (more likely, 8 centi-bitcoins at exchange rates of 2015). Imagine, in addition, that her bitcoins are three distinct outputs that are not spent at various addresses, whose totals are 3,5 and 6 bitcoins, respectively. Alice isn’t in fact able to have an address that has eight bitcoins and therefore she has to mix two outputs to create a single transaction she then pays the store. Buy best technology user mailing leads online.

This is a clue. The transaction is permanently recorded on the blockchain and anyone who reads it could infer from it that two of the inputs in the transaction are controlled by the same person. This means that shared spending is proof that the two input addresses are under the control of each other. diverse input addresses. There may be certain exceptions. Maybe Alice and Bob have a roommate and decide to purchase the teapot each by providing an input for one transaction. However, generally speaking it is a sign of that they control each other.

However, it doesn’t end there. An adversary could repeat this procedure to transitively link an entire group of transactions to one entity. If a different address is linked to any of Alice’s addresses this way and we can conclude that each address is part of the same entity. it is possible to apply this knowledge to group addresses. If, in general the output at a different address is used in conjunction with an output from one address in the cluster, this new address could become part of the cluster. Buy best technology user mailing leads online.

In the next chapter, we’ll look at an anonymity method known as CoinJoin that is based on this assumption. For now If you believe that the majority of users use regular Bitcoin wallet software, without specific techniques to protect their privacy the clustering is likely to be fairly robust. We’ve not yet discovered how to connect the clusters to authentic identities but we’ll look into this in the near future.

Best Technology users email leads

Sidebar: Randomization of Change Address. A prior version of the bitcoin QT program had an error that would always show the address for the change at the beginning of the output of the transaction that has two outputs. This meant it was easy to recognize the change address in a lot of transactions.

Best Technology user email leads

This issue was resolved in 2012, however it highlighted an important aspect: wallet software has a vital part to play in protecting security and anonymity. If you’re working on applications for wallets, be aware of numerous dangers to be aware of. In particular, you must select the location that the address of change is in a random manner to ensure that you don’t give too much to the adversary!

In our case imagine that the price of the teapot has increased between 8 and 8.5 bitcoins. Alice cannot discover a set of unspended outputs she could combine to create the exact amount required for the teapot. In lieu, Alice exploits the fact that transactions may have multiple outputs as shown in figure 6.3. One output is the payment address for the store and the other one is an “change” address owned by Alice herself. Buy best technology user email leads online.

Take this scenario from the perspective that of an antagonist. They could conclude that both input addresses belonged to the exact same individual. It is possible an output address belongs to the same user however, they don’t have a way to be certain which one is. Although there is a 0.5 output is less doesn’t mean that it’s a alter address. Alice could hold 10,000 bitcoins in an account and then she could spend 8.5 bitcoins in the teapot and transfer all the rest of 9,991.5 bitcoins to herself. In this scenario, the larger output is actually an address change.

An alternative could be the case that the teapot cost just 0.5 bitcoins, Alice didn’t need to make a transaction using two inputs. This is because the input of 3 bitcoins or the input of 6 bitcoins would have been enough all by itself. However, the efficiency of this algorithm is dependent on the specifics of implementation for popular wallet software. There’s nothing to stop users (or their users) from joining transactions, even when they aren’t strictly required. Buy best technology user email leads online.

Idioms of use.Implementation specifics of this type are referred to as “idioms of use”. A 2013 team of researchers discovered an idiom of usage that was applicable to all wallet software. This resulted in a powerful heuristic to identify the change address. In particular, they discovered that wallets usually generate a new address each time it is necessary to change the address. Because of this type of usage changing addresses are typically addresses that never been seen on the blockchain. Non-change outputs on the contrary, are usually not brand new addresses, and could have been previously seen in the chain. A hacker could make use of this information to differentiate between changes addresses and associate them with input addresses. Buy best technology user email leads online.

Utilizing the idioms of use could cause errors. Change addresses are fresh ones just happens to be an inherent feature that wallet programs. This was true in 2013 when researchers looked into the feature. Perhaps it’s still the case, however, it could be false. Users could choose to modify the default behaviour. Buy best technology user email leads online. The most important thing is that anyone who is aware of this method can easily take advantage of it. Even in 2013, researchers observed that the technique produced numerous false positives. In this case, they were able to cluster addresses that were not actually related to the same company. They found that they required substantial supervision and intervention in order to cut down the false positives.

Connecting real-world identities to clusters. On Figure 6.4. We can see how Meiklejohn and colleagues. clustered Bitcoin addresses by using the simplest usage idioms as algorithms. The graph isn’t yet labeled, as we’re still not able to assign names for the groups.

Best Technology users email database leads

It is possible to draw some educated guesses on the information we have about bitcoin and Bitcoin economy.

Best Technology user email database lists

Back in 2013, Mt. Gox was the biggest Bitcoin exchange and we can guess that the large purple circle is the address controlled by the exchange. You may also be able to see that the brown circle on the left is very little Bitcoins despite having the highest amount of transactions. This pattern is similar to the betting service Satoshi Dice, which is one of the most popular games in which you pay a small amount of bitcoins in exchange for a bet. In the end, this isn’t a good method to determine clusters. It’s a guesswork and knowledge-based approach and is only applicable to the most popular services. Buy best technology user email database leads online.

Tags that are transacted through transactions. What about visiting the site for every merchant or exchange and finding the address that they provide to receive bitcoins? This isn’t working however, as most services will announce a new address for each transaction, and the address that is shown to you is not part of the chain of blocks. There’s no reason to wait for that, as the address won’t be revealed to anyone else.

Best Technology user email database lists online